Free Downloadable Guide

Charitable Funds Management Case Study: 

How One Fortune 500 Company Scaled Its Impact and Cut Costs by More Than $225,000

How One Fortune 500 Company Scaled Its Impact and Cut Costs by More Than $225,000

Is it better to manage your company's workplace giving charitable funds distribution in-house or to work with a third-party partner? 

One Fortune 500 company was stunned when it calculated the cost of managing its company’s in-house system for processing employee charitable payroll contributions. The company assumed it was making a fiscally prudent decision by managing this process itself. However, after analyzing what it took to manage its homegrown system, the company quickly learned its assumption was false.

After making some changes to its process, the Fortune 500 company ended up scaling its impact and cutting costs by more than $225,000. How did they do that?

Whether you're a Fortune 500 company in a similar boat or you're a small company that would like to achieve Fortune 500-level results (on a small budget) - it's possible! 

Download this case study to learn how.

Download now
Allura - Teamwork (1)

In this free guide, you'll learn:

Whether your company should manage donations in-house or consider the efficiencies and cost-savings of working with a third-party partner.

Five characteristics of an effective charitable funds distribution system.

How one Fortune 500 company saved money by moving it's in-house process to America's Charities.
Download now
Hands - Lightbulb

Did You Know?

Processing costs can be as high as 25% for a nonprofit while combined funds distribution can reduce those costs to less than 10%. These reduced administrative costs result in savings to the company and more funds distributed to the nonprofit organizations being supported. 

Download your case study today!
America's Charities, 2023